Hockey Canada trial

1

Call me naive, but I’ve never heard of juries being dismissed and the judge deciding a case is going to be a bench trial. I’m in no way defending the defendants, but that seems totally bizarre that a judge can just say, oh, you wanted a jury trial? Even though we’re well into this trial, I’m deciding you are no longer entitled to a jury because a juror complained about a lawyer.

Rick Westhead on X: “Justice Maria Carroccia has discharged the jury in the trial of five former members of Canada’s 2018 world junior hockey team after a juror complained that defence lawyers were acting unprofessionally, three weeks after a juror complaint about one of the same lawyers led to a” / X

2

The defense agreed to continue without a jury

1 Like
3

Interesting.

So the defen(c)e thinks the players have a better chance of getting off with the judge deciding the case. Goes against conventional wisdom that you only need one juror to vote not to convict to overhaul a case.

4

If the attorneys pissed off the jurors though (which it sounds like they did), I can see wanting the judge instead.

1 Like
5

Thanks, that makes sense. But that seems like a hell of a concession in a case that seemed 50/50 at best to result in convictions.

6

It sounds like that entire proceeding has had levels of fuckery akin to the Young Thug trial in Atlanta.

1 Like
7

Wow. London isn’t exactly “small town Canada” either. It’s 400,000-plus metro, about the size of Youngstown and the fourth-most populus region of Ontario behind only Toronto, Ottawa and Windsor.

Surprised to hear how underprepared the city was for this extremely high-profile case and how antiquated the facilities are.