I can tell you with 100% certainty that Miami’s administration and the Board of Trustees care tremendously about rankings, and they are not happy with the 100+ overall position. Some initiatives are going on:
- Have more applications to decrease acceptance rates
- Focus on hiring faculty that have PhDs (the % of faculty with terminal degrees is another criterion)
- Some colleges, like FSB, are reducing the teaching load of a few professors who are active in doing research to increase publication volume.
I am not familiar with a central vision along the lines of “we want to be the Xth best in Y,” although it might exist within the Provost/President circles. I know that the FSB dean is very clear that the division wants to be among the top 10 public business schools for undergraduate education.
Realistically, a massive improvement in our ranking numbers is really hard to achieve, given the budget constraints we have. Ohio currently pays for about 9% of the university revenue budget (that number was over 50% 48 years ago), which means the university is heavily dependent on tuition. This causes the number of enrolled students to increase in periods of crises, which in turn affects the student/faculty ratio (one ranking criterion). Although it is much improved now, during COVID years, my division couldn’t teach small classes (e.g., having 10 people) or even electives. This affected the class size component of the rankings as classes were packed. Again, all of the above is much better now, and we should be a bit better next year.
Here comes the ugly news. Pell grant numbers and their performance also influence some rankings. In 2020, Miami had the second lowest Pell Grant student enrollment rate in the country among public colleges. To fix that, the university has just raised $46 million (the largest individual gift in Miami’s history) for scholarships to support Pell-eligible students.
All the words in bold above are ranking criteria. You can see the full list here: https://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/articles/how-us-news-calculated-the-rankings.
Overall, note how several of the current achievements and endeavors are directly linked to those criteria, from accepting more students to targeted fundraising, financial support, and efforts to diversify the student body. It is safe to say that President Crawford, Provost Mullenix, and the deans are working on this. At the end of the day, it boils down to money: more money means more scholarships, more and better faculty, higher salaries for faculty, more staff to help students graduate on time, etc. All of these affect rankings.
(Sorry for the long post. I love to connect with alumni, and I am happy to discuss all of the above in person whenever any of you are in Oxford)